76/82
  • Pages
01 About
02 Framework
03 Process Steps
04 ASSESS
05 ASSESS: Prioritise and analyse KPIs
06 ASSESS: Three approaches
07 ASSESS: Refresh approach
08 ASSESS: Light review approach
09 ASSESS: Deep dive approach
10 ASSESS: Tools
11 ASSESS: Supply chain mapping tools
12 ASSESS: Geo-mapping tools
13 ASSESS: Reporting and dissemination
14 EVALUATE
15 EVALUATE: Vendor evaluation and selection
16 EVALUATE: 4 steps for optimal outsourcing
17 EVALUATE: In-country supply chain assessment
18 EVALUATE: External benchmarking
19 EVALUATE: Investment case model
20 EVALUATE: High-level vendor assessment matrix
21 EVALUATE: Examples of vendor evaluation
22 CONTRACT
23 CONTRACT: Critical success factors for contracting
24 CONTRACT: Nine-step contracting approach
25 CONTRACT: Templates and examples
26 IMPLEMENT
27 IMPLEMENT - 3 Steps
28 IMPLEMENT - Managing the transition process
29 IMPLEMENT - Peformance management tools
30 IMPLEMENT - Governance procedures
31 IMPLEMENT - Examples of successful outsourcing arrangements
32 Enabler Tools
33 POLICY
34 POLICY: Introduction to procurement policy
35 POLICY: Examples of effective policy tools
36 ADVOCACY AND GOVERNANCE
37 ADVOCACY AND GOVERNANCE: Stakeholder expectations
38 ADVOCACY AND GOVERNANCE: Guidelines for advocacy processes
39 ADVOCACY AND GOVERNANCE: Examples of governance structure and communication platforms
40 ADVOCACY AND GOVERNANCE: Example of logistic working groups
41 ADVOCACY AND GOVERNANCE: Example of supplier forums
42 PEOPLE
43 PEOPLE: Introduction and capability matrix
44 PEOPLE: Considerations across Process Steps
45 PEOPLE: Skills considerations
46 PEOPLE: Working conditions
47 PEOPLE: Motivation considerations
48 PEOPLE: UK Case study
49 TECHNOLOGY
50 TECHNOLOGY: Introduction
51 TECHNOLOGY: VAN
52 TECHNOLOGY: eLMIS
53 TECHNOLOGY: OpenLMIS
54 TECHNOLOGY: Logistimo
55 TECHNOLOGY: Stock Visibility System (SVS)
56 TECHNOLOGY: Route optimisation
57 CASE STUDIES
58 CASE STUDY: Zambia
59 CASE STUDY: Kenya
60 CASE STUDY: Uganda
61 CASE STUDY: Mozambique
62 Pharmacy toolkit
63 Pharmacy toolkit intro
64 Pharmacy toolkit case studies
65 Pharmacy toolkit framework
66 Pharmacy Assess
67 Pharmacy Evaluate
68 Pharmacy Contract
69 Pharmacy Implement
70 Pharmacy Enabler tools
71 Laboratory services toolkit
72 Laboratory services toolkit introduction
73 Laboratory services toolkit review
74 Laboratory services toolkit framework
75 Laboratory services: Assess
76 Laboratory services: Evaluate
77 Laboratory services: Contract
78 Laboratory services: Implement
79 Laboratory services: Enabler tools
80 Tool Index
81 Acknowledgements
82 CONTACT

Process Steps

1. Assess > 2. Evaluate > 3. Contract > 4. Implement

Enabler Tools

Policy | Advocacy and governance | People | Technology

Case Studies

Process Step 2:

Evaluate

The toolkit for outsourcing laboratory services

In this section, you will learn:

  • How to evaluate for optimised outsourcing
  • Develop a request for proposal and vendor assessment matrix

The Diagnostic Network Optimisation informs the process for decision-making and conducting an evaluation for laboratory network outsourcing.

Decision-tree approach to evaluation

The models suggested are illustrative – there are many models that vary by country and Diagnostic Network Optimisation strategy.

The three tasks to conduct an evaluation and vendor assessment are:

Task 1:

Inputs from Diagnostic Network Optimisation report (from Process Step 1: Assess)

View

Task 2:

Questions about vendor capacity and capability

View

Task 3:

Request for proposal creation and vendor assessment matrix

View

Case study: The national sample and results transport network, Uganda

The Uganda tuberculosis specimen referral network followed a Diagnostic Network Optimisation approach to inform potential outsourcing.

Context

In Uganda today, 900 peripheral laboratories refer specimens to one centralised laboratory in Kampala – the Uganda National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (NTRL). Specimens are transported to the NTRL for culture and drug-susceptibility testing through a combination of laboratory couriers and the national postal service – Posta Uganda. Before 2008 there was no formal specimen referral system in Uganda. Only 50 of the 900 sites participated in the referral system with negative impacts for tuberculosis testing – in the entire 2008 calendar year, a total of only 655 specimens were sent to the NTRL.


Approach

In 2008, the Ugandan Ministry of Health and the NTRL in Kampala, following a Diagnostic Network Optimisation approach, partnered with Becton Dickinson and the US PEPFAR to develop a formalised route and safe system that reduces diagnostic delays and improves tuberculosis surveillance in Uganda. The evaluation process for the exercise followed these steps:

  1. Diagnostic Network Optimisation approach to assessing laboratory network optimisation: using GIS software, the performance level of each peripheral site to refer tuberculosis specimens to the NTRL was assessed against district population densities. A new national specimen referral system was designed using the hub and spoke model  Diagnostic Network Optimisation report disseminated.
  2. Inputs from Diagnostic Network Optimisation report for Strategic Vendor Questions: recommendations from the United Nations Transport of Dangerous Goods were reviewed alongside key questions for capability and capacity of in-country third-party logistics.
  3. Vendor Assessment Matrix: Assessment of third-party logistics led to the decision not to outsource to the private sector but rather contract to an existing public sector organisation (Posta Uganda).

Outcomes

The Ugandan Ministry of Health redesigned its specimen referral network into the National Sample and Results Transport Network (NSRTN) and chose to retain the sample transport function in-house. The following milestones were achieved:

  • 93% of laboratory facilities (835/900) were mapped between 2008 and 2011
  • 724 healthcare and postal staff members covering 72% of Uganda’s districts received specialised training
  • The number of tuberculosis specimens received at the NTRL increased from 655 in 2008 to 5,813 in 2011
  • Transport times were reduced, and 94% of specimens reached the NTRL successfully by 2011

Request for proposal creation for evaluation: specimen packaging for sample transportation19

The courier’s ability to comply with strict packaging specifications is a key component for evaluating sample vendors. Packaging specifications include:

The triple packaging system (figure 1)20 is used to pack samples of varying preparations (whole blood, sputum, dry blood etc.). for transportation. It prevents damage and cross-contamination of specimens.

  • Primary packaging: The leakproof primary receptacle is wrapped in cotton wool or paper towel to absorb the entire contents if the container leaks.
  • Secondary packaging: The cotton wrapped primary container is placed inside a secondary container, e.g., a sealed Ziplock bag.
  • Tertiary packaging: The secondary container is placed upright in a cool box container – it should be shock-resistant and protect the contents from physical damage during the trip. This container should be labelled according to inter/national regulations for infectious materials.

For cold transportation conditions, cool packs are recommended for samples requiring between 2-8℃, while dry ice is best used for deep-frozen transportation at -80 ℃. These must be placed outside the secondary packaging.

Note: Refer to other Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for sample transportation, available here.

Summary of Evaluate

The second Process Step, Evaluate, begins by understanding the inputs from the Diagnostic Network Optimisation report in Assess. In this Process Step, you have learnt what questions to ask for outsourcing consideration. Finally, you learnt how to develop a request for proposal. The third Process Step, Contract, will focus on the contracting process for outsourcing laboratory functions for network optimisation.

NEXT: PROCESS STEP 3: CONTRACT

About | Framework | Pharmacy toolkit | Laboratory services toolkit | Tool Index | Acknowledgements | Contact


18Sources: Interviews for the Toolkit for Outsourcing Laboratory Services, November 2020; Joloba et al., April 2016. Strengthening the Tuberculosis Specimen Referral Network in Uganda: The Role of Public-Private Partnerships.

19Source: Interviews for Toolkit for Outsourcing Laboratory Services s, November 2020. Challenge tuberculosis. 2014. Specimen Transportation: A How-To Guide. Available: https://www.challengetb.org/publications/Challenge_tuberculosis_Specimen_Transport_HowTo.pdf.

20Source: Biosafety and Biosecurity in European Containment Level 3 Laboratories: Focus on French Recent Progress and Essential Requirements. 2017; Boris A Pastorino, Xavier de Lamballerie, Remi Charrel; https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Basic-triple-packaging-system-for-infectious-substance-transport_fig1_317630194